Skip to Content
📄 Fibonacci Laws — Read the paper
ReferenceThe Derived Moon (DLT-1)

The Derived Moon

DLT-1 — a framework-native lunar theory in the form of Meeus, with every constant derived, attributed, or anchored by design.

Every practical lunar ephemeris of the last century descends from one lineage: Hansen and Delaunay, then E. W. Brown’s Theory of the Motion of the Moon, then the Éphéméride Lunaire Parisienne (ELP2000), distilled for working astronomers by Jean Meeus in Chapter 47 of Astronomical Algorithms. Those tables are magnificent — and, as presented, they are numbers without origins: polynomial coefficients, periodic amplitudes, and secular terms adopted from fits and inherited conventions.

This document presents the same theory in Meeus’s own form, with one difference: every number now carries its origin. Nothing here is a new observation and nothing is a re-fit. It is a derivation of the existing baseline from the constants of the Holistic Universe Model — the Earth Fundamental Cycle (H = 335,317 years), a small set of physical constants and J2000 anchors (the complete input list is §0), and Newtonian gravity — with the framework’s own three-body laboratory (a first-principles numerical integrator built from those constants alone) as the derivation instrument.

Every value belongs to exactly one of four origin classes:

ClassMeaningExamples
DerivedFollows from framework constants + gravityall periodic amplitudes, apsidal/nodal periods, latitude compression, the full secular T²/T³ budget, the precession acceleration, the aberration correction
AttributedA documented convention, decomposed against primary sourcesthe equinox-of-date frame content, the channel exponents’ effective values, the inclination-constant convention
Observationally definedNature defines it through a hypersensitive resonance; the mechanism is proven, the value is nature’sthe A1 rate (one number)
Anchored by designEpoch initial conditions — required by any theory, including Brown’s and ELP’sthe five J2000 phases

The remaining fitted content of the entire theory is a single 5.1″ residual term (a series-truncation artifact of the abridged tables) and coefficients below 0.15″. The complete technical derivation record — every experiment, budget, and gate — lives in the repository’s technical documentation (doc 66) .


0. The inputs — the complete list

Everything in this document is computed from the closed set below plus Newtonian gravity. Nothing else enters. The set has four groups:

Framework constants (the model’s own structure — shared with every other part of the Holistic Universe Model, not lunar-specific):

InputValueRole in the lunar theory
Earth Fundamental Cycle H335,317 yrthe general precession p = 360·13/H; the 8H month lattice; every cycle period
Mean tropical year365.2422036 dthe day/year clock (the 365.2422 d IAU input snapped to the H/8 grid)
Earth eccentricity base (Law 5)0.015386the fully-derived H/3 e_E fluctuation line — the solar-perturbation channel that drives the perigee/node T² and the E-factor
Inclination-cycle anchor21.77°the e_E line’s phase (itself exact lattice arithmetic from the balanced year — the perihelion longitude cancels)
Framework obliquity line ε(t)H/3 + H/8 harmonicsthe equatorial conversions, the obliquity carrier, the ṗ composition

Physical constants (standard observed values — IAU/JPL/LLR class, cited, none fitted here):

InputValueRole
Earth/Moon mass ratio81.30056816 (DE440)the laboratory’s GM split; the barycentric wobble
AU + sidereal year149,597,870.698828 km; 365.256363004 dGM of the Sun (Kepler); the solar orbit
Speed of light299,792.458 km/sthe analytic aberration correction
LLR tidal acceleration Γ−25.86″/cy²the tidal part of the secular budget (the α₁ chain)
Sun/planet mass ratios, Earth J2 + R_EDE440 / IAUthe eight-body laboratory and the Earth-figure term
Secular ė, ë of Earth’s orbit−4.2037e-5/cy; −2.534e-7/cy²the T³ derivation’s curvature convention (documented Taylor anchors — the shipped channel runs on the derived H/3 line)

Lunar inputs (the Moon’s own numbers — and this is the point of §3: most of them are not free):

InputValueStatus
Sidereal month27.32166156 dthe one dynamical lunar input — 8H-quantized; from it + gravity the apsidal period, nodal period, and semi-major axis all emerge (§3)
Orbital eccentricity e_M0.054900489shape input (the EoC identity 2e − e³/4 verifies it at 2 ppm)
Mean osculating inclination5.1573°tilt input (measured from the theory itself; the catalog 5.1453964° is the Brown/ELP normalization constant — §3)
Mean distance384,399.07 km (LLR)scale input (the Kepler-effective a = 386,321 km is derived, not input)
Axial tilt6.687°currently input; a catalog composition (Brown/ELP constant + the measured 1.5424° Cassini obliquity — see §3); Cassini-derivable (registered future work)
Catalog apsidal / nodal periods3,231.493 / 6,798.38 dnot independent — they emerge from the month + gravity at ±0.5‱/±0.3‱; retained as the of-date J2000 calibration anchors
A1 rate131.849 °/cyobservationally defined — nature’s resonance denominator (§2)

Epoch phases (initial conditions, required by any theory including Brown’s and ELP): the five J2000 argument constants (L′₀, D₀, M₀, M′₀, F₀), the scene’s three start positions, and the Sun-side J2000 anchors (mean longitude 280.46646°, perihelion 102.947°).

That is the entire list. Given these inputs, gravity produces the periodic tables of §2, the emergent periods of §3, the secular budget of §1 and §5, and the deep-time behaviour of §6 — with one 5.1″ fitted residual remaining in the whole construction.


1. The five fundamental arguments

Meeus Ch. 47 builds the theory on five polynomial arguments. Their J2000 constants are epoch anchors (by design); their rates and higher coefficients are now derived or attributed:

L′ = 218.3164477 + 481267.88123421·T − 0.0015786·T² + T³/538841 − T⁴/65194000 D = 297.8501921 + 445267.1114034·T − 0.0018819·T² + T³/545868 − T⁴/113065000 M = 357.5291092 + 35999.0502909·T − 0.0001536·T² + T³/24490000 M′ = 134.9633964 + 477198.8675055·T + 0.0087414·T² + T³/69699 − T⁴/14712000 F = 93.2720950 + 483202.0175233·T − 0.0036539·T² − T³/3526000 + T⁴/863310000

The rates. Every rate is an equinox-of-date quantity: inertial content plus the general precession p = 360·13/H of the Earth Fundamental Cycle. Two of the composite argument rates reduce to exact lattice identities: the Moon’s sidereal mean longitude rate equals L′tropical − p to 0.003 ppm, and the Jupiter-perigee argument rate (2L′trop − M′ − 2nJupiter) closes to 0.19 ppm. At geological time the arguments do not ride these frozen polynomials: they are chain-integrated through the framework’s evolving months, precession, and solar mass loss.

The L′ secular terms — the crown of the derivation. The T² coefficient (−5.68296″/cy²) decomposes against primary sources with zero free parameters, closing to 0.08″:

Component″/cy²Origin
Tidal n̈/2−12.930the framework’s LLR-consistent tidal chain (Γ = −25.86″/cy²)
Planetary (Adams–Laplace)+5.8665derived: the solar-eccentricity channel; its sensitivity k, measured convention-free by an adiabatic ramp, is −2370 ± 40 °/cy per e² — and the value this budget row implies (−2350) sits inside that band
Earth figure (J2)+0.1925Chapront et al. (2002) decomposition, attributed
Frame ṗA+1.11113derived at 104% (see §5)
Meeus-era tidal convention gap+0.077½·(ΓLLR − Γ embedded in Meeus’s polynomial, −25.706)
Sum−5.683= Meeus’s coefficient

The T³ term (1/538841 °/cy³) — historically an unexplained tail — is derived at 98.8%: it is the Adams–Laplace channel’s own curvature (the secular ë of Earth’s eccentricity passed through the channel, +104.2%) plus the obliquity carrier’s second order (−6.5%) and the frame’s ṗA T³ (+1.2%). The T⁴ is 41% channel, remainder documented (0.004° at 584 BCE).

The perigee and node (M′, F). Their secular T² coefficients follow the solar-perturbation channel Ẍ/Ẋ = s·3eė/(1−e²) along the framework’s own H/3 eccentricity line. The shipped exponents (sϖ = 2.407, sΩ = 1.018) are frame-effective values that reproduce Meeus exactly; removing the equinox-of-date frame acceleration gives the physical exponents 2.479 and 0.867 — which the three-body laboratory reproduces from pure gravity at 100.3% and 101.5%.

The channel in full, checkable form — the eccentricity line, the perturbation strength, and the rate law:

e_E(t) = base · (1 + cos θ(t) / 2) θ(t) = 3 · (t − balancedYear)/H · 360° − 180° (balancedYear = −302,635 — the System Reset epoch) g(e) = (1 − e²)^(−3/2) (solar perturbation strength) ϖ(T) = ϖ₀ + ϖ̇₀ · [ T + ∫₀ᵀ ( (g(e_E(t))/g₀)^s_ϖ − 1 ) dt ] (node Ω: same with s_Ω) J2000 Taylor check: T² = s · Ẋ₀ · κ / 2, κ = 3eė/(1−e²) s_ϖ = 2.407 → −0.010318 °/cy² (Meeus ϖ: −0.010320) s_Ω = 1.018 → +0.0020752 °/cy² (Meeus Ω: +0.0020753)

The line’s inputs are §0’s base, the balanced year, and H — nothing lunar; the observed J2000 eccentricity (−0.9%) and its rate (+1.7%) are predictions of this line, not inputs.


2. The periodic series, derived

The heart of Meeus Ch. 47 is its tables of periodic terms with argument multipliers (D, M, M′, F). The framework’s three-body laboratory — built only from the framework’s constants (GM of the Earth–Moon system, the mass ratio, the AU, the sidereal year, and the lunar orbit inputs) — reproduces them from gravity alone. Coefficients in Meeus’s unit of 0.000001°:

Longitude (ΣL), top of the table:

DMM′FderivedMeeusratio
00106 289 6086 288 774100.01%
20−101 274 0961 274 027100.01%
2000658 329658 314100.00%
0020213 697213 618100.04%
0100−185 141−185 116100.01%
0002−114 367−114 332100.03%
20−2058 84358 793100.08%
2−1−1057 04457 06699.96%
201053 30753 32299.97%
2−10045 75545 75899.99%
01−10−40 810−40 92399.72%
1000−34 720−34 720100.00%
0110−30 288−30 38399.69%
200−215 40815 327100.53%
0012−12 526−12 52899.99%
001−210 84510 98098.77%
40−1010 66910 67599.94%
003010 04810 034100.14%
40−208 5628 548100.17%
21−10−8 035−7 888101.86%

Latitude (ΣB), the full main family:

DMM′FderivedMeeusratio
00015 128 9205 128 122100.02%
0011280 684280 602100.03%
001−1277 759277 693100.02%
200−1173 264173 237100.02%
20−1155 42955 413100.03%
20−1−146 28246 271100.02%
200132 58632 573100.04%
002117 19317 19899.97%
201−19 2559 26699.88%
002−18 8188 82299.95%
2−10−18 2168 216100.00%
20−2−14 3344 324100.24%

The classical small-parameter scalings behind the table — every named term traces to one product of the §0 inputs (m = nSun/nMoon ≈ 1/13.37):

equation of center = 2·e_M − e_M³/4 = 6.288774° (exact identity, verified at 2 ppm) evection ∝ m · e_M → 1.274027° variation ∝ m² → 0.658314° annual equation ∝ m · e_S → 0.185116° (carries the E-factor = e_E(t)/e_E(0)) parallactic ineq. ∝ m · (a/a′) → 0.034720°

Three structural identities inside these tables:

  • The equation of center is exact framework algebra: the main term 6.288774° = 2e − e³/4 at the framework’s lunar eccentricity, an identity verified at 2 ppm.
  • Meeus’s E-factor (the eccentricity damping of M-bearing terms, 1 − 0.002516T − 0.0000074T²) is eEarth(t)/e₀ — the framework replaces the unbounded polynomial with its bounded H/3 eccentricity line.
  • The three additive corrections: A2’s amplitude is derived from gravity at 101 ± 8% (322 vs Meeus’s 318, in 10⁻⁶ ° — and the historical “window-growing multiplet” around it dissolved into a measurement artifact); the “Lp − F” flattening term (1962 × 10⁻⁶ °) is derived from Earth’s oblateness at 99.8%; A1’s amplitude is gravity-sized while its rate is observationally defined — the framework proved it sits on the 18V − 16E − M′ near-resonance where parts-per-million in planetary years move the beat by degrees per century, so no finite theory can pin it: nature does.

3. The periods that emerge

Brown needed the lunar theory’s free constants; ELP adopted them; the framework derives two of the three lunar inputs from the third plus gravity:

QuantityEmerges from the laboratoryStar-referenced valueConvention note
Apsidal precession3232.4 d (±0.5‱)3232.60 dequinox-of-date partner: 3,231.493 d (the catalog value)
Nodal regression6793.3 d (±0.3‱)6793.48 dequinox-of-date partner: 6,798.38 d (the catalog value)
Semi-major axis386,321 kmthe three-body a for the 27.32166156-day month, dissolving the 384 399/385 001/384 748 “which a” ambiguity

The catalog periods and the dynamical ones differ by exactly the frame: node and equinox are both retrograde (the equinox chases the node), the apsis is prograde against it. The framework’s H/13-frame bookkeeping, the of-date observables, and the star-referenced dynamics are three consistent views of one motion:

frame conversion: N_of-date = N_star ∓ 13 cycles per H (the equinox regresses once per H/13) emergence law: T_precession ∝ T_year² / T_month (Brouwer–Clemence scaling, ± the e_E channel) deep-time invariant: T_apsidal × H = H₀²/N = constant

At J2000 the invariant products are Tapsidal × H = 2,966,728 yr² and Tnodal × H = 6,241,369 yr² (37,899.5 and 18,014.875 cycles per H — eighth-integers, because the lattice counts are integers per 8H) — held exact at every epoch by the (H/H₀)² scaling.

The inclination. The catalog ”5.1453964°” is not the Moon’s dynamical tilt — it is Brown/ELP’s theory constant, the normalization of the latitude coefficient family. The Moon’s true mean osculating inclination, measured directly from the theory itself (angular-momentum vector over two node cycles), is 5.1573°, and the framework’s laboratory reproduces the compression between the two views (sinF coefficient / dynamical tilt = 0.9944) at 0.01% from pure gravity. A curiosity worth recording: the compact formula “1 − m²” reproduces this compression to 1″ at the real Moon — and the framework’s parameter scans disproved it as a theorem: it is a coincidence of our Moon’s particular eccentricity and tilt ((3/2)e² + sin²i/8 ≈ m² to 1%). The honest statement — a measured map, not a closed form — is part of this theory’s discipline.

The axial tilt. The Moon’s spin axis obeys Cassini’s laws (spin axis, orbit normal, and ecliptic pole coplanar), holding a measured 1.5424° obliquity to the ecliptic. The catalog “tilt to orbit” of 6.687° is a convention-composed number: 5.1453964° + 1.5424° = 6.6878°, built on the Brown/ELP inclination constant — with the dynamical tilt (5.1573°) the same sum reads 6.700°, so the two catalog numbers must be read in one convention together. Deriving the 1.5424° Cassini obliquity from the framework’s nodal rate and the lunar gravity moments is registered future work — it would remove one more input and settle which plane convention the composition should carry.


4. What the fitted patch turned out to be

The model’s Moon historically carried a small fitted RA/Dec correction against JPL. Decomposing it revealed that 98–102% of the patch was annual aberration — the model’s frames carry apparent-Sun content while the reference was astrometric. The correction is now computed analytically from the framework’s speed of light and Sun vector (itself free of hardcoded coefficients: rates from the framework year and H/16 perihelion cycle, equation-of-center from the Kepler identity):

u′ = normalize( u − v_Earth / c ) (astrometric direction from the apparent one; |v_Earth|/c = κ = 20.5″, the aberration constant)

What remains fitted in the entire visual pipeline is one 5.1″ term — the truncation difference between the abridged 60-term tables and the full numerical ephemerides — plus coefficients under 0.15″.


5. The precession acceleration, composed

The deepest frame quantity in the budget — the acceleration ṗA of general precession (+1.1054″/cy², IAU 2006) — is composed from first principles:

  • the ecliptic-of-date motion comes from the framework’s eight-body laboratory, pure gravity: π̇ = 47.5″/cy (observed: 47.0);
  • the obliquity history ε(T) is the framework’s own H/3 + H/8 cycle line;
  • the equator is a luni-solar precession cone about the moving ecliptic pole with the classical cos ε torque law;
  • one rate anchor pins the composed J2000 rate — and independently lands the luni-solar rate at 5039.2″/cy, within 0.013% of the IAU value that was never an input.

Composed result: +1.15″/cy² = 104% of the observed acceleration. En route, the framework’s long-standing “remaining 38% of the equinox acceleration” was identified exactly: it is the planetary χ-channel — the equinox sliding along the equator because the ecliptic tilts underneath it.


6. Bounded at deep time

Polynomial ephemerides explode outside their fit windows: Meeus’s T² parabola for the mean longitude reaches 7 892° of spurious longitude at +200 000 years, and his E-factor reaches E = −40. The framework replaces every secular polynomial with a bounded carrier riding a physical cycle:

  • the planetary term rides the bounded H/3 eccentricity line (staying ≤ ~220° where the parabola reached 7 892°);
  • the figure + frame terms ride the bounded obliquity cycle;
  • the tidal evolution runs through the framework’s Earth-rotation chain, valid across ±500 million years;
  • the lunar precession periods obey the deep-time invariant Tapsidal × H = constant.

The complete factored deep-time law for the precession periods — invariant mean × bounded modulation, implemented identically in the simulator and the website’s deep-time engine:

T(t) = T₀ · (T_year(t)/T_year,0)² · (T_month,0/T_month(t)) / (g(e_E(t))/g₀)^s

The same construction that reproduces Meeus in the historical window degrades gracefully into deep time instead of diverging.


7. Verification

The derivation is validated once, against every record class at hand:

TestResult
JPL Horizons, 6 088 positions (2000–2050)RMS 0.0009° RA / 0.0008° Dec (total 0.0012°)
NASA Lunar Eclipse Canon, 12 064 events (−1999 to +3000)99.6% physical-event recall, 98.8% type accuracy, 74% within 15 min UT
Modern eclipse catalog (2020–2025)14/14 within ±60 s
Timed Babylonian eclipses (Almagest, −720 to −490), no external ΔTmean −7 min, RMS 37 min, 5 of 6 within the recorded bands
26 documented historical solar eclipsesumbra tracks consistent from Bur-Sagale (−762, 26 km) to 2026

The last line of the ledger is the discipline that produced it: the framework derives; the classical values confirm. Where a number could not be derived, this document says so — the A1 rate belongs to nature, the epoch phases belong to the calendar, and 5.1 arcseconds belong, for now, to the truncation of the tables.


Complete technical record: experiments, budgets, certification gates, and the laboratory source are in the repository documentation . Values in this document are frozen as DLT-1.

Last updated on: