Closure

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. I mean that.

You might be feeling a bit overwhelmed by all this information. Although the model looks very simple — just two movements working against each other — it is still a lot to digest. I know the feeling. Writing it was quite a journey too.

Before we close, there’s one more thing I want to share: what this model might actually mean. Not just for astronomy, but for how we understand our place in the universe.

1. The universe is cyclic & balanced

   This is the heart of everything I’ve shown in this book. The obliquity, eccentricity, inclination and precession movements can all be modelled within a perihelion cycle of 18,636 years.

   Two forces create all the complexity we observe: Axial precession moving clockwise and Inclination precession moving counter-clockwise. That’s it. A balanced system, cycling through time.

2. FIBONACCI is at the core of our solar system

   The golden spiral appears everywhere in nature: sunflowers, pinecones, galaxies. What I’ve shown is that it also appears in our solar system’s time cycles.

   The ratio 13:3 between Axial and Inclination precession is a Fibonacci ratio. This wasn’t something I set out to find. It just emerged from the data. And to me, that’s remarkable.

3. The gravity force might need to be re-examined

   All mass-estimates of distant celestial bodies have been based, to this day, upon Einstein’s and Newton’s theories of gravity.

   Do we need to modify any gravity law if we consider our solar system is actually cyclic and balanced? I don’t have the answer, but I think it’s a question worth asking.

4. Einstein’s theory of relativity might need to be re-examined

   The theory of special and general relativity is mainly proven by the mismatch between the observed position of Mercury’s perihelion and the gravitationally calculated position.

   Mercury’s precession rate  deviates from the precession predicted from Newtonian effects. The observed precession is around 43″ per century longer than calculated with Newton’s laws according to Wikipedia.

   This “anomaly” was resolved as one of the definitive proofs of Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.

   Albert Einstein  is considered one of the greatest and most influential scientists of all time. He gave us General relativity and Special relativity.

   To be honest, suggesting he might have been wrong about the foundation of our universe sounds ridiculous at first. But here’s the thing: the definitive proof of these famous theories is still to be delivered.

   The model described in this book might show that there is no such anomaly. The extra 43″ per century precession of Mercury’s perihelion is due to the movement of Earth around its Axial Precession Orbit (APO). This scientific paper  reviewed Albert Einstein’s method and explains that the missing precession rate of 43″ per century coincides with a movement of only 96 km per year. This is more or less aligned with the actual movement of Earth around EARTH-WOBBLE-CENTER.

   Also in the book Mathematical Aspects of Paradoxes in Cosmology - Can Mathematics Explain the Contemporary Cosmological Crisis?  the writers Michal Křížek and Lawrence Somer have summed up everything that is wrong with the theory and the Mercury perihelion proof presented.

   “The estimated difference of Mercury’s perihelion shift obtained from astronomical observations and numerical solution of the problem of N bodies is therefore ill-conditioned. According to [312], formula (4.2) represents a weak experimental and theoretical confirmation of General Relativity”

   See also this paper which shows the formula of Mercury’s missing perihelion precession calculations are wrong: Einstein’s Spacetime Curvature claim Belied By one second Loophole of his own Perihelion Precession Equation , or see this paper .

   “On one hand, Einstein’s two equations that serve as mathematical evidence of spacetime curvature artefact - yield in fact only one-second-based calculation sampling of the perihelion precession. And there are no further equations nor argumentations from Einstein as to why or how spacetime curvature just needs only one-second-based sampling for the calculation of the perihelion precession. And on the other hand, The observed angle of perihelion shift should not be a time-based sampling value - whether one second or any amount thereof - but should be instead a full orbit-based value, because the perihelion precession occurs only once per orbital revolution.”

   I have added both formulas to calculate the missing perihelion precession in the Excel sheets for you to check as well.

   Additionally you could just model Mercury’s orbit according to Kepler’s 3rd law to have it aligned to all known Sun occult dates.

   The rate of precession changes because of Earth’s path around the EARTH-WOBBLE-CENTER combined with the counter movement of the PERIHELION-OF-EARTH around the Sun.

   

   This movement explains the anomalous advance of the perihelion of Mercury.

5. The “precession of the equinoxes” is physical

   In the model described in this book, what is commonly known as the ‘Precession of the Equinoxes’ is simply caused by Earth’s slow, clockwise motion around its ~22,937 year circular Axial Precession Orbit (APO).

   As shown, this movement is not linear in time but sometimes speeds up and slows down. This is something the current heliocentric model cannot easily explain.

6. Why the solar day is longer than the sidereal day, and the solar year is shorter than the sidereal year

   These two undeniable and well-known facts still lack satisfactory explanation in the current heliocentric model. The model presented in this book provides simple explanations for these apparently contradictory observations:

   The Sidereal Day (Earth’s rotation) is linked to the solar day AND to the Solar year according to the coin rotation paradox.

   The Stellar Day is linked to the Sidereal year.

   Once you see the connection, it makes perfect sense.

7. The climate fluctuations of Earth are explained

   The widely accepted Milankovitch cycles are based upon inclinations of 22.1 to 24.5 degrees. The model as described here can vary between 22.3 to 24.6 degrees.

   More importantly, the inclination cycle explains the 100k year problem, a puzzle that has troubled climate scientists for decades.

8. Science is never settled

   I’ve learned something important through this process: science is never settled. Every model, including mine, is just our best current understanding of reality.

   The heliocentric model replaced the geocentric model. Maybe one day, something will replace or refine what I’ve proposed here. That’s how science works. And that’s okay.

   NOTE: Although I have modelled the Holistic Universe Model with very detailed exact figures, off course, the real movement figures in practice might still differ a bit.

   The most important part is to look at the trend of this model.

   original picture can be found on sketchplanations 

Final Thoughts

Only time will tell if this model is correct, needs refinement, or turns out to be completely wrong. That’s the nature of science, and I’m at peace with that.

What I do know is this: for three years, I followed a question that wouldn’t leave me alone. The result is what you’ve just read. Whether it changes how we understand the universe or simply serves as a stepping stone for someone else’s discovery, I’m grateful for the journey.

I can’t think of all arguments by myself, so feel free to shoot holes in the model. Your questions, critiques, and challenges are exactly what it needs. That’s how we get closer to the truth.

If you’ve made it to the end of this book, I hope it has sparked something in you: curiosity, skepticism, wonder, or all three. That’s really all I could ask for.

“Simple is hard and complex is easy.”

Thank you for reading. Now go explore the Interactive 3D Solar System Simulation  and see for yourself.