Closure

As we come to the closure of the book, the reader might be a bit overwhelmed by all this information. Although the model looks very simple, it is still a lot to digest.

But before we really close off, there is one additional topic I like to address: The implications of the model.

1. The universe is cyclic & balanced

   The obliquity, eccentricity, inclination and precession movements are just as good modelled in a perihelion cycle of 18,636 years.

2. FIBONACCI is at the core of our solar system

   The golden spiral could already be seen in different parts of nature, and now as well in our solar system with the time cycles.

3. The gravity force might need to be re-examined

   All mass-estimates of distant celestial bodies have been based, to this day, upon Einstein’s and Newton’s theories of gravity.

   Do we need to modify any gravity law if we consider our solar system is actually cyclic and balanced?

4. Einstein’s theory of relativity might need to be re-examined

   The theory of special and general relativity is mainly proven by the mismatch to the observed position of Mercury perihelion compared to the gravitational calculated position.

   Mercury’s precession rate  deviates from the precession predicted from the Newtonian effects. The observed precession is around 43″ per century longer then calculated with Newton laws according to wikipedia.

   This “anomaly” was resolved as one of the definitive proofs of Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.

   Albert Einstein  is considered as one of the greatest and most influential scientists of all time. He is the inventor of famous theories like General relativity  and Special relativity . To write down he was wrong about the foundation of our universe sounds at first sight ridiculous, but the definitive proof of these famous theories is still to be delivered.

   The model described in this book might show that there is no such anomaly. The extra 43″ per century precession of Mercury’s perihelion, is due to the movement of Earth around it’s Axial Precession orbit (APO). This scientific paper  reviewed Albert Einstein’s method and also further explains the missing precession rate of 43″ per century coincides with a movement of only 96 km per year. This is more or less aligned with the actual movement of Earth around EARTH-WOBBLE-CENTER.

   Also in the book Mathematical Aspects of Paradoxes in Cosmology - Can Mathematics Explain the Contemporary Cosmological Crisis?  the writers Michal Křížek and Lawrence Somer have summed up everything that is wrong with the theory and the Mercury perihelion proof presented.

   “The estimated difference of Mercury’s perihelion shift obtained from astronomical observations and numerical solution of the problem of N bodies is therefore ill-conditioned. According to [312], formula (4.2) represents a weak experimental and theoretical confirmation of General Relativity”

   See also this paper which shows the formula of Mercury’s missing perihelion precession calculations are wrong Einstein’s Spacetime Curvature claim Belied By one second Loophole of his own Perihelion Precession Equation , or see this paper .

   “On one hand, Einstein’s, two equations that serve as mathematical evidence of spacetime curvature artefact - yield in fact only one-second-based calculation sampling of the perihelion precession. And there are no further equations nor argumentations from Einstein as to why or how spacetime curvature just needs only one-second-based sampling for the calculation of the perihelion precession. And on the other hand, The observed angle of perihelion shift should not be a time-based sampling value -whether one second or any amount thereof - but should be instead a full orbit-based value, because the perihelion precession occurs only once per orbital revolution.”

   I have added both formula’s to calculate the missing perihelion precession in the Excel sheets for you to check as well.

   Additionally you could just model Mercury’s orbit according to Kepler’s 3rd law to have it aligned to all known Sun occult dates.

   The rate of precession of the equinoxes accelerates because of Earth’s path around the EARTH-WOBBLE-CENTER combined with the counter movement of the PERIHELION-OF-EARTH around the Sun.

   

   This movement explains the anomalous advance of the perihelion of Mercury.

5. The “precession of the equinoxes” is physical

   In the model described in this book, what is commonly known as the ‘Precession of the Equinoxes’, is simply caused by the Earth’s slow, clockwise motion around its ~22,937 year circular Axial Precession Orbit (APO).

   As shown, this movement is not linear in time but sometimes speeds up and slows down.

6. Why the solar day is longer than the sidereal day - and the solar year is shorter than the sidereal year is explained

   These two undeniable and well-known facts still lack satisfactory explanation in the heliocentric model. The model presented in this book provides simple explanations for these apparently contradictory observations:

   The Sidereal Day – which is earth rotation - is linked to the solar day AND to the Solar year according to the coin rotation paradox.

   The Stellar Day is linked to the Sidereal year.

7. The climate fluctuations of Earth are explained

   The widely accepted Milankovitch cycles are based upon inclinations of 22.1 to 24.5 degrees. The model as described here can vary between 22.3 to 24.6 degrees.

   The inclination cycle explains the 100k year problem.

8. Science is never settled

   .

   NOTE: Although I have modelled the Holistic Universe Model with very detailed exact figures – off course – the real movement figures in practice might still differ a bit.

   The most important part is to look at the trend of this model.

   

   original picture can be found on sketchplanations 

Only time will tell if the model is correct, total rubbish or the basics are correct but needs to be improved further. Until then, it is just a model.